Saturday, January 29, 2011

SPD Pedals and Platform Support


When it comes to SPD-style clipless pedals, there is some discussion about the benefits of models with integrated platforms versus without. For example, here is an email I received from a reader last week:


...I see in your photos that you use both the Crank Brothers Eggbeaters and Candy pedals. Which do you recommend for a beginner? My boyfriend likes Shimano A-520 pedals because of the extra platform support. His thought is that the Candys provide the same level of support, but not the Eggbeaters. Do you agree?

To answer this question, let me backtrack a bit. The Eggbeater and Candy pedals fromCrank Brothersare identical, except that the Candys (right) have a flat platform built around the bindings and the Eggbeaters (left) do not. When choosing pedals, I heard several arguments in favour of the Candys, including that the platform offers extra foot support, that as a beginner I would have an easier time clipping into a larger pedal, and that the platforms would allow me to ride in regular shoes.



I have now ridden with Candys on my own roadbike for the past 9 months. Over that time I have also borrowed friends' bikes with Eggbeaters (including a 100K ride).In the very beginning, the Candys were indeed easier for meto clip into. However, this advantage was short-lived andjust weeks later I already had no problem using Eggbeaters and could not distinguish between them. I can also confirm that the Candys are much easier to ride in street shoes, on the rare occasions I find myself doing this on a roadbike. But as far as foot support, I feel absolutely no difference between the two models. I thought that I would, but I don't.



The Eggbeaters have their own advantages. The lack of platforms makes them considerably lighter. They offer more points of entry. And they are easier to clean. Overall, I think that I prefer them, although really I am fine with either.



While not the same as the Crankbrothers system, you could draw parallels to this comparison with Shimano SPDs. There are pedals that consist of bindings alone, and those that incorporate a platform. Some claim the platform provides additional foot support and allows for more power to be transferred, making it similar to a road pedal. Others argue that this is not the case, as the platform sits too far below the binding to provide significant support. I have no comment on the mechanics of this at large, but can only say that with my style of riding, and my specific pedal and shoe combination, I cannot feel the difference. As a beginner, I would suggesttrying lots of pedals and figuring out what feels better to you.

Friday, January 28, 2011

Patagonia Sun Hoody

One of the really fun things about winter alpine climbing is the amount of gear it takes. OK, one of the really annoying things about winter alpine climbing is how much gear it takes.



Because of that I am always looking for gear to make my fun..more fun.



Once in a while you come across something that is a total surprise and you wonder how you ever got along without it. Patagonia's R1 Hoody comes to mind. Patagonia's Sun Hoody is the easy to wear, base layer that is lighter yet than the R1 Hoody. And I am not a big fan of Patagonia clothing. Generally is is over priced imo and not very well tailored for the price point they ask.



But not the case on this one. Seldom do I find a useful piece of climbing clothing that I want on every climb winter or summer, rock or ice, but also a piece of clothing I want to wear every day...24 hrs a day. And this one I do. I really do. Admittedly I look like a dork in it but I LOVE this hoody! Wearing one as I type this as matter of fact. Yes, it is SICK...but these things rock!









I now own three of them and would own more if I could find them.

$65 @ full retail and so far I have only seen two colors...off white/silver and the ninja color, olive drab. Gotta love the military contracts!







Patagonia sez:



Men's Lightweight Sun Hoody $65 msrp

Breathable, fast-drying hooded top with 30 UPF sun protection for next-to-skin use.



A highly evolved second skin designed to maximize your time on the water. For simultaneous air conditioning and tough 30 UPF sun protection, the super breathable, fast drying Sun Hoody is made of lightweight polyester jersey. A 3 panel hood protects your head, a hip closure pocket keeps keys, wax and hand lines sorted, and we've added thumb loops at the cuffs for added coverage. Recyclable through the Common Threads Recycling Program.



Details

•Soft and supple polyester fabric with sun protection

•3-panel, self-fabric hood provides airy, ventilated sun protection

•Thumb loops at cuffs for added coverage and sun protection

•Zippered pocket at hip

•Flat seams reduce chafe

•4.3-oz 100% polyester jersey with 30-UPF sun protection. Recyclable through the Common Threads Recycling Program

•246 g (8.7 oz)

•Made in Vietnam.



Technology



The UV protection offered by this garment is rated “very good.” *



* When tested in accordance with Australian/New Zealand test methods AS/NZS 4399 or AATCC 183/ASTM6603/ASTM D6544.

First Light, Frozen Forest



After a couple of failed attempts at capturing nice early morning light on the ice at Tettegouche State Park (due to cloudy skies), I finally had success this morning. I had to leave the house just before 5:00 AM in order to make it here for sunrise, but it sure was worth it. The other day when I drove down to try and capture this scene, the sky was clear when I left home. By the time I arrived at Tettegouche, however, the clouds had moved in and covered the entire sky, effectively ruining sunrise. So.... this morning as I drove towards Tettegouche, I was a bit tense thinking I was going to run into a cloudy sky again. But, luck was on my side and the clouds stayed away. Once the sun broke above the horizon and started to illuminate the ice, I was awestruck by the beauty.

Here are a few more photos of me enjoying and photographing the Frozen Forest (taken by my friend and fellow photographer Paul Sundberg):







And one taken by my friend and fellow photographer Roger Nordstrom:


Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Alpha FL and Shift LT shells?

Here is a quick comparison on two of the best inlight weight hard shell technology available today.



I added a third shortly after:

http://coldthistle.blogspot.com//01/a-third-shell-material-westcombs-focus.html



Any of the threecan be easilyused for most anysport where you need someprotection from nasty weather,including climbing. In the case of my buddy Dave and I, ice climbing for sure but lift/side-hill on a snow board or skis as well or a quick run on the bikes.



It was no accident that we both showed up for a reunion at our once home townski area kitted in similar gear. Even though I was skiing on lwt Dynafit gear and Davewas on a snow board we would be on the same terrain. Do this stuff long enough and there ends up being a well thought out and comfortable"uniform" fora goodday out. Matching colors with your Bro? That is just a little weird!



David and I have been playing on this particular ski hill together almost longer than I can remember. I do seem to recallusteaching basic search and rescue techniques to the volunteer ski patrol bitd and ripping it up around them on 3 pin tele gear though. GearI amhappy to see long gone from mystorage closet!












Below: Dave in his Arcteryx Alpha FL leading





Arcteryx Alpha FL shown above

10.7 oz. for a Men's Large, $400

Two different Goretex fabrics:

2.4 oz Gore Active Shell, 2.9 oz Gore-Tex Active Shell reinforcements

a very light Goretex shell













Below: Dane leading in his Westcomb, Shift LT.












The Westcomb, Shift, shownabove

11.9 ounces for a Men's Large, $400

Two different Neoshell Fabrics:

340 NRS Polartec® NeoShell® - Fly weight nylon ripstop and 360 NP Polartec® NeoShell®

Lightest Neoshell to date




Although I have likely climbed more ice in a hard shell than any other pieceof clothing, today a hard shell is one of my least favorite garments to use. More likely one I would use skiingthese days, so I can dress downfor a good work out and stillcut the wind chill.



But if you are going to climb in a hard shell the newest Gore and Polartec "hard shell" technologies are actually pretty spectacular. There is a light weightEpic shell that will be here soonthatwill make a goodcomparison to these two. That shouldbe interesting.



Before I offer some comparisons on these two how about some back ground? BITD (as in back in the day) belay jackets were rather unheard of. We had big jackets but few of the guys I climbed with ever bother to bring one. We dressed in the morning with what we thought we might need for warmth that day. May be a extra layer to go under our shell (likely apile jacket or down vest) but not likely one to go over it. Basically you assumed you would suffer, too hot when you were working hard and too cold when stuckwhile belaying a slow lead. You learned to climb fast for all the obvious reasons.



No one climbing ice seriously back then would ever tolerate a gumbie gettingon and then lacing up an ice climb like it was a rock climb in the sun. That same thing is socommon now. Couple of reasons for the lack of empathy back then. Few ever carried more than a 10 or so ice screws. Screws were justtoo hardto place even in the best of conditions. The other was yousimply didn't get on climbs you weren't technically capable of. Experience taught you and your partner that. Falling on ice was simply unacceptable. You ran out ice climbs, just to keep everything moving and everyone warm. I've had several painful reminders of how not to ice climb, when Dave can't come out to play.



When you are climbing within your skill level you can move quickly and carry little gear all while staying warmer.



The first one day ascents of GCC on Kitchener, the Super Coulior on Deltaform, Slipstream, Teardrop and Polar Circus were all done in a similar manner. Hard shells, no extra clothing. tiny packsand climbers performing well within their skill levels.



No surprise the skill levels have changed. The technical difficulty at which thecurrent generation of climbers are capable of is simply amazing within that perspective. Their ability to get above their own pro...not so much.



It should be no surprise then if you want to climb light and fasta hard shell built to exacting standards and lacking many of the modern accouterments some require is still a good choice for most conditions where ice is involved.



When Dave and I kitted up on the Parkway last week, we were both in soft shell pants, a moderate amount of base layers, little insulationand hard shell jackets. I used the Shift LT,Westcomb's new light weight (the LT), sewn from two types of Polartec's Neoshell. Dave showed up in theArcteryx, Alpha FL (fast and light) , using two weights of Goretex Active shell. The jackets are very, very similar in design and function. Which made for some easy comparisons.



What does all that mean to you? Either is a nice "action suit" jacket but not much reallyin actual differences. More differences in the pattern cut imo than performance. But no question, there are differences in performance. Lets talk pattern first. The "FL" designation from Arcteryxstands for "fast and light". Fair enough, the jacket deserves that kind of label. Not sure or care who got there first but the Westcomb Shift LT is equally "fast and light". Jackets might as well be clones of one another. Same single chest pocket and helmet capable hood. Greatfit on both hoods with a helmet. I find the Westcomb patternfits me in a large better than the Arcteryx stuff generally does in a Large. The Westcomb stuff is cut a little bigger in the shoulders and arms.I am thankful for the better Westcomb patterns (for my body shape anyway) as most every new shell my size I try onthese days seems to have arms the size of a #2 pencil. I'm 190# and 6'1". That forces me to get the next size up in a lot of clothing. But Dave (who is almost skinny) at 185# and 6'3"loves the fit of a size large Alpha FL. Both have long tails that stay tucked into a harness. The sleeves are long even when you are full stretched out and seal well under or over gloves. Perfect! We can easily move along from all that now.Find the one jacket that fits you the best, would be mysuggestion.



Performance of the shell fabrics?



Goretex has an enviable reputation of cutting the wind and keeping you dry. The Alpha FL does both. The Shift is currently the lightest Neoshell garment yet made. And IMO it shows. Awesome jacket for sure and I love climbing in mine. You will stay dry from the inside or the outside. The newestNeoshell material, like the newest Goretex stretches a bit. But while I think the Neoshell breaths better under a heavy work load I also thinkthe Goretex is more wind proof.



We were climbing in the minus mid teens Celsius. I've recently learned that jackets that are less than 100% wind proof are chilly. My Shift was perfect for leading. But I wanted toquickly get onmy belay jacket (which is wind proof) when I wasn't leading. With the samebase layers and very similar insulation under our shells, Dave wore a belay jacket once in several days of climbing. I wore mine at every belay, every day we were out, if there was any sort of wind. Some of that can be tossed to my"new" body reacting poorly to the cold these days. But not all of it.



So what did I really think? I like the bright yellows and green color combos on both jackets. When I was cold in the wind, rightfully or not, I liked (envied)the Goretex version. When I was pumped stupid and sweating bullets I preferred the Neoshell. I sure dried out fast! Truth is it all boils down to fit for me. The Westcomb fit me very well in a large. The Arcteryx didn't in a large (too small or a XL. too big). That is a pretty common issue for me..similar thing happens withsome of the Patagonia clothing.



Both fabrics are really really good for what we were using them for, which was ice climbing. May be even betterfor skiing and snow boarding is my thought.



Figure out what you need for clothing and what will fit into your own system. Then find the garment that has a pattern that fits you the best with those same qualities and features. Honestly? It is pretty hard to go wrong with so many really good choices. If you screw it up first time around you'll are just as likely to learn how to climb faster or suffer more. How bad can it really get :)
















Monday, January 24, 2011

Workcycles Bakfiets Long

Workcycles Bakfiets Long

A year and a half ago I tried a Bakfiets at a friend's bike shop in Vienna. These iconic Dutch cargo bikes are available in two lengths and the one I rode then was the short version. Now a bike-friend in Boston has acquired the Bakfiets Long, and I've had a chance to ride that as well. Aside from the larger size, I was curious how a bike like this would translate locally. Compared to the center of Vienna, our part of Boston is both hillier and less bike-friendly. Would I feel comfortable mixing it up with car traffic on a bike like this? What about cycling up the inclines I regularly encounter even on shorter commutes? These are the aspects of the bike I mostly focused on this time around.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long


To recap: The term bakfiets (plural: bakfietsen) literally translates to "box bike." The modern incarnation of this front-load hauler was designed by Maartin van Andel of bakfiets.nl. Those machines branded with the Workcycles name have been outfitted with upgraded components by the Amsterdam-based concern, but are essentially the same bikes (you can read about the Workcycles version of the bakfiets here). The steel frames are manufactured and powdercoated by Azor. Prices for complete bikes are in the $3,000s range, depending on options.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

A handsome plywood box sits low upon the extended frame, between the rider and the 20" front wheel (the rear wheel is 26"). There are essentially two head tubes, connected by a linkage system.In my previous write-up readers requested shots of the steering linkage, so I made sure to get them this time.



Workcycles Bakfiets Long

Here you go.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long
And here. And here.





Workcycles Bakfiets Long

As the rider turns the handlebars, the steering is activated through the linkage and the front wheel turns.






Workcycles Bakfiets Long

Like most traditional Dutch city bikes, the bakfiets comes equipped with fenders, a full chaincase, dress guards, and a rear rack.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

Dynamo lighting with standlights is included, front and rear,




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

as well as enclosed roller brakes and hub gearing (Shimano Nexus 8-speed with twist shifter).




Workcycles Bakfiets Long
The 4-point Stabilo parking stand supports weight evenly.





Workcycles Bakfiets Long

The handlebars are mildly swept back.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

The long cargo box is about 100cm x 60cm at its widest points, tapering from back to front. It is rated for 80kg (176lb), in passengers or cargo.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

Many of those who purchase these bikes do so to transport small children. There is a little folding bench in the box for this purpose. The bench fits two, though the box itself is rated to fit 4 (I believe a second bench can be installed for those who plan to do this).




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

The bakfiets can also function as a work bike, hauling anything from huge loads of groceries, to heavy industrial supplies. In Europe I have seen these in use by professionals such as florists, caterers, construction workers, and sculptors, just to name a few. For those who use the bike in that capacity, a waterproof cargo cover is available. Unlike the structured, canopy cover for transporting children, the cargo cover stretches flush over the box.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

The bakfiets owner - known online as "cycler" - has had it for just over two months now and uses it about twice a week as a supplement to her main city bike. On her blog, Biking in Heels, it has been a sort of recurring joke how much stuff she'd often end up carrying on her bike - thinking up various creative, but sometimes precarious ways to secure it all. After years of this, cycler decided to take the plunge and buy a cargo bike. She test rode a few and felt immediately at ease with the Dutch front-load model. So bakfiets it was. She ordered the bike directly from Workcycles in Amsterdam, powdercoated silver and dark orange to her specs. In fact, its purchase is partly to blame for inspiring her to ...drumroll... open up her own local bike shop. But more on that another time.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

I've ridden cycler's long bakfiets twice so far. First in her presence on some neighbourhood MUPs. On a later occasion I took the bakfiets away and rode it on my own along my local commute route, mostly on streets without bike infrastructure.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

On both occasions, I arrived on my Brompton folding bike, which I typically ride front-loaded, like a mini cycle-truck. In a sense, switching to the bakfiets felt like riding a much larger and heavier version of the same bike. Of course in many ways they are wildly different - but the front end handling is not dissimilar. Particularly with less weight in the front, the steering is quick and light, requiring a gentle touch. Once you get used to that, the bike feels natural and intuitive to control. When making turns or adjusting its line of travel, the bakfiets is surprisingly nimble. Having the front wheel so far in front does feel disconcerting at first, but becomes natural once you get used to it. Some riders report that the linked steering takes getting used to, but I did not feel any effects specific to the linkage system. Others have described that the bike does not lean easily on turns, but I find that it leans fine. Overall I suspect that a rider's first reaction to the bakfiets depends on their riding style, inherent sense of balance, and the kinds of bikes they are already accustomed to. Some find it intuitive right away, others need practice.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

The seat tube angle on the bakfiets is quite relaxed and the handlebars high, placing the rider in an upright position. But the "cockpit" is not as tight as it is on some Dutch city bikes (i.e. the handlebars are unlikely to hit your thighs on turns). A low bottom bracket combined with the slack seat tube allows for full leg extension while pedaling and easy toe-town stopping while remaining in the saddle.




One thing that is consistently said about the bakfiets is that it feels weightless in motion even when loaded, and I think that's an accurate assessment. The bike is not fast, but on reasonably flat terrain it is easy to propel forward, without any sensation of pushing or struggling. It just kind of floats as you pedal, boat-like. Henry of Workcycles attributes this quality to weight distribution: Because the box sits behind, rather than over the front wheel and fork, the weight is kept very low to the ground and does not affect steering. With a design like this, the weight is effectively part of the downtube.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

With a large heavy package and some other items thrown into the box, I rode the bakfiets on a 4 mile loop along the Cambridge/ Somerville line, mixing with car traffic most of the way. As far as stability - both in motion and at starts and stops - I did not experience any problems. The bakfiets was very easy to keep upright and, steered with a light touch, it felt downright relaxing to ride. After gaining some confidence, I began to play around with the steering. It felt like the only thing that could make this bike fishtail was the expectation that it would fishtail. But really it wanted to ride where I pointed it, and was very responsive to changes in course. So even if I did make it fishtail intentionally, the wobble was easy to correct. Just a few minutes into the ride I felt like I had excellent control of the bike. Riding with weight in the box does not feel any more challenging than without. And steering the long-box version did not feel any different from my recollections of the short version.




The main difference really between riding the bakfiets and other bikes I am used to, was that I had to be cognisant of its size - mainly the width - when passing cars and making maneuvering decisions. While surprisingly maneuverable, it is simply a big bike with a wider turn radius than what I am used to (including the Xtracycle long tail). For instance, on the same street I can make a U-turn on the longtail easier than on the bakfiets - though possibly with practice I could become more proficient at the latter.




As far as hills... Geared low, the bakfiets handles reasonable inclines well, retaining its momentum and that easy floaty feel. But as soon as I tried it on a real hill (say an 8-10% grade spanning half a mile - Spring Hill for locals) - it just refused to keep going at a certain point, even in 1st gear. I have seen bakfiets owners stand up and mash on the pedals furiously to get over short hills. But on longer hills on the outskirts of town, I imagine this could get exhausting for anyone but the strongest of cyclists. Me, I would need a cargo bike that could go long distance reasonably fast and get me up a 14% grade without standing, so a bakfiets would not be the best choice. But for those whose commutes are limited to flatter, shorter routes this would not be an issue.




Workcycles Bakfiets Long

Over the past couple of years, I have spotted 6 distinct bakfietsen in active use around the greater Boston area. That is actually an impressive number, considering there has been no local dealer. Whenever possible, I've talked to the owners about their bikes. The general feedback is that they love the comfortable ride, the hauling capacity, and how easy it is to dump things into the box without having to secure every item. Those who have children have said their kids prefer sitting on the little bench in front to sitting on the back of a longtail (some families have both types of bikes, or have switched from one to another). On the downside, storing and parking the bakfiets can be a challenge given its size, as is maneuvering it along the sidewalk. And then, of course, the hills: "Not the best bike for hills" is the consensus.




I enjoy the way the bakfiets rides, and I think that it looks adorable. By all accounts it is a tough, all-weather transport machine that holds up well in rough conditions and retains its value well when sold used. For many it is a car replacement, which more than justifies the cost. As far as transporting substantial cargo, the bakfiets is just one of several ways to carry similar amounts of weight - the others popular options being long johns, long tails, and box trikes. Which method a rider finds preferable will depend on their circumstances - including handling preferences, terrain and other factors. As I've mentioned before, I love seeing more cargo bikes in our city, and I welcome cycler's new addition. Full picture set here.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

More of Williamsburg VA

More of Williamsburg. Today we had a nice lunch together. We were the only ones in the restaurant which meant the server could chat with us. Sometimes that is a nice thing, sometimes that is not so nice. It was ok today. Nathan commented on the great copper plated menus and he told us the guy who ordered them got fired over it. They were very pricey and he ordered 500 of them. Very strange, since maybe 100 would have been enough for this place. Ah, the things we learn from talking to people.



And for Jack and Diane:

Thursday, January 20, 2011

As It Might Have Looked 400 Years Ago

These are photos I took of distance views from around Coronado State Monument. Of course the fences are new. 2nd photo shows a brush ramada or outdoor cooking area that would have been similar to those used by the Indians at the time the Spaniards first saw this area.

As always the Sandia Mountains can always be seen. Coronado State Monument is just north of Albuquerque and a couple of hours drive south of Santa Fe. It is right on the edge of the town of Bernallio, and about 20 minutes drive from my house. Don't know why it has taken me about 25 years to get back here since the last time I went. I plan to go more often if I can.